American Texts I
On this page
Read the assigned text alongside its entry. Recall the situation, explain a formal choice using a specific detail, and connect it to a theme or comparison. Test each model answer against the text.
How to use this guide. These sixteen entries run from Franklin to Dreiser’s “Typhoon”; Pound onward is in American Texts II. Use the period introductions for literary history. For each Exam angle, write your own answer in complete sentences before reading the model. Check exact quotations in the assigned edition, or use a precise paraphrase.
Primer. The American Enlightenment (roughly 1730s–1790s) prized reason, empiricism, natural rights, and useful knowledge; its characteristic literary forms are the essay, the pamphlet, the almanac, and the autobiography rather than fiction or lyric. Print culture was political culture: newspapers and pamphlets circulated arguments under pseudonyms (a standard 18th-century convention that also enabled satire and hoax). Benjamin Franklin embodies the type — printer, scientist, diplomat, author of the Autobiography and Poor Richard's Almanack, master of the ironic persona. Thomas Paine represents the radical pamphleteer whose plain style aimed at (and reached) the common reader. Both required Franklin texts are satires that work by making the reader condemn a familiar practice through an unfamiliar mirror.
Benjamin Franklin — "On the Slave Trade" (1790) — pseudonymous satirical hoax letter
¶- What it is: A letter to the editor of Philadelphia's Federal Gazette, dated 23 March 1790 and signed "Historicus" — Franklin's last public writing (he died on 17 April 1790). It responds to Congressman James Jackson of Georgia, who had defended slavery in the House of Representatives against Quaker abolitionist petitions. "Historicus" claims Jackson's speech resembles one delivered a century earlier (allegedly in 1687, cited to a nonexistent source, "Martin's Account of his Consulship") by Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim, a member of the Divan of Algiers, opposing a petition by a sect called the Erika, or Purists, to abolish piracy and the enslavement of Christians. The invented Algerian speech reproduces the standard pro-slavery arguments point for point — who will cultivate the land, the slaves are better off than at home, they cannot safely be freed, religion sanctions the practice — with white Christians as the slaves. The Divan rejects the petition, and Historicus dryly concludes that Congress, guided by similar reasoning, will probably do the same.
- Themes & motifs: Reductio ad absurdum of pro-slavery logic; self-interest masquerading as principle and piety; role reversal (enslaved Christians) as the engine of moral recognition; the universality of rationalization across cultures and religions.
- Form & devices: Literary hoax with a deadpan documentary frame (fake date, fake source, fake speaker — authenticating apparatus parodied); structural irony: the reader rejects the Algerian's logic and is trapped into rejecting Jackson's; verbal irony in the polite closing; the pseudonym "Historicus" mock-lends scholarly authority. Direct line from Swift's A Modest Proposal — satire by monstrous analogy rather than open argument.
- Context & significance: Enlightenment satire in the service of abolition: reason tests an argument by transposing it. Franklin was president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society (from 1787), and the 1790 petitions to the first Congress were its work; the essay turns his last weeks into a public political act. It also shows the 18th-century Barbary corsair context (Muslim states enslaving European captives), which made the reversal instantly legible.
-
Remember:
- Federal Gazette, 23 March 1790; signed "Historicus"; Franklin died 17 April 1790 — his final public writing.
- Parodies the pro-slavery speech of James Jackson of Georgia in the House of Representatives.
- Invented speaker: Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim, of the Divan of Algiers, supposedly in 1687, against the petition of the Erika ("Purists").
- The satire answers Quaker/abolitionist petitions debated in the first US Congress in 1790.
-
Quotable: The Divan's resolution: "The Doctrine, that Plundering and Enslaving the Christians is unjust, is at best problematical; but that it is the Interest of this State to continue the Practice, is clear; therefore let the Petition be rejected."
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), describe how "On the Slave Trade" uses irony to attack pro-slavery arguments.
The essay is a hoax built on structural irony: Franklin invents a 1687 speech by an Algerian official that repeats, almost point for point, the arguments Congressman Jackson had just used to defend African slavery in Congress. Because the invented speech defends the enslavement of white Christians by Muslim corsairs, American readers instinctively condemn its logic — and are thereby forced to condemn the identical logic used at home. The deadpan documentary frame (a precise date, a cited but nonexistent source) sustains the hoax and prevents the reader from dismissing it as mere fancy. The closing resolution of the Divan drives home the point that such debates are decided by economic interest, not justice.
What is the function of the pseudonym and the fabricated historical source?
The pseudonym "Historicus" and the citation of "Martin's Account of his Consulship" parody the apparatus of learned authority, making the fiction look like sober historical evidence. This was a standard Enlightenment print-culture convention that Franklin had exploited since his youth (Silence Dogood, Poor Richard), and it lets the satire unfold without an identifiable author to attack. Most importantly, the mask delays recognition: readers commit to condemning the Algerian argument before they realize they are reading about themselves.
Why can this text be called a representative Enlightenment document?
It subjects a social institution to the test of reason, exposing the inconsistency of applying one moral standard to Christians and another to Africans. It works through the characteristic Enlightenment media — the newspaper essay, the pseudonym, the satirical persona — rather than through sermon or confession. And it reflects the Enlightenment faith that public argument can change policy, since it was written to support concrete abolitionist petitions before Congress by the author who presided over the Pennsylvania Abolition Society.
Related topics and texts
Benjamin Franklin — "Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America" (1784) — satirical essay
¶- What it is: A short essay written during Franklin's diplomatic years in France and printed on his private press at Passy in 1784. It opens by rejecting the label of the title — "savage" merely names a difference of manners — and then strings together anecdotes contrasting Native American courtesy with white rudeness. The Iroquois politely decline the Virginians' offer (made after the 1744 Treaty of Lancaster) to educate six of their youths at the College of William and Mary, observing that college-bred young men return good for nothing as hunters, warriors, or counsellors — and counter-offer to educate a dozen Virginian sons and "make men of them." A Swedish minister preaches the fall of man; the Susquehanna elders courteously accept his "story" and reciprocate with their own maize-origin myth, at which the minister explodes — revealing who actually lacks manners. Finally the Iroquois orator Canasatego concludes from a Sunday visit to an Albany church (where a merchant afterwards lowers his beaver price) that whites meet weekly to learn how to cheat Indians, and contrasts Indian hospitality to strangers with the white demand for money.
- Themes & motifs: Cultural relativism — politeness, civility, and religion look different from each side of the frontier; hospitality as the true measure of civilization; European ethnocentrism and religious intolerance satirized; conversation and council manners (never interrupt) versus the noisy British House of Commons.
- Form & devices: Essay built of juxtaposed anecdotes posing as neutral ethnographic "remarks"; the irony is structural — Franklin rarely editorializes, letting the Indians' courteous speeches condemn the whites; ironic redefinition of key terms (savage, civility, politeness); the noble-savage convention (cf. Montaigne's "Of Cannibals") used as a mirror for Europe rather than as anthropology.
- Context & significance: A key Enlightenment statement of cultural relativism and one of the earliest sympathetic literary treatments of Native Americans by a major American writer — though its Indians are an idealized rhetorical device, not documentation. Written for a European audience while Franklin was American minister to France, it belongs with his Passy "bagatelles."
-
Remember:
- Written/printed 1784 at Passy (France), during Franklin's diplomatic mission.
- Key anecdotes: the declined College of William and Mary offer (after the Treaty of Lancaster, 1744); the Swedish minister vs. the Susquehanna corn myth; Canasatego, the church visit, and the beaver-price trick.
- Thesis sentence is the opening line (see Quotable).
- Genre: satirical essay using the noble savage convention against European self-congratulation.
-
Quotable: "Savages we call them, because their manners differ from ours, which we think the perfection of civility; they think the same of theirs." Also: "…no people so rude, as to be without rules of politeness; nor any so polite, as not to have some remains of rudeness."
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), describe the theme(s) of "Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America."
The essay's central theme is cultural relativism: what counts as savagery or civility depends entirely on the observer's own customs, as the famous opening sentence announces. Franklin develops this by contrasting Native American conduct — patient council debate, respectful listening to other religions, unconditional hospitality — with white interruption, missionary intolerance, and commercial greed. A second theme is the hollowness of European claims to superiority, since every anecdote shows the "civilized" party behaving worse than the "savage" one. The essay thus turns an ethnographic label into a satire of the labelers.
How does the essay develop the motif of politeness?
Politeness is the thread connecting all the anecdotes: the Iroquois soften their refusal of the college offer because their rules forbid contradicting a proposal outright, and they even make a courteous counter-offer. The Susquehanna elders listen to the missionary's Genesis narrative without objection and expect the same courtesy for their own myth — which the minister, the supposed representative of civilization, refuses with abuse. Council procedure (perfect silence, no interruptions) is explicitly contrasted with the disorder of the British House of Commons. By the end, "politeness" has changed sides: the Indians possess it as a social system, while the whites merely claim it.
What does the Canasatego anecdote about the Albany church refer to, and what is its point?
Canasatego relates that he once visited Albany on a Sunday, was told that whites meet in church to learn "good things," and then discovered that the merchant Hans Hanson offered him a lower price for beaver after the meeting. He concludes that the weekly meeting must be where white men learn to cheat Indians on the price of beaver. The anecdote satirically fuses religion and commerce, suggesting that white piety functions as a cover for sharp dealing, and it caps the essay's contrast between Indian hospitality — food and lodging freely given to strangers — and the white question "Where is your money?"
Related topics and texts
Thomas Paine — Common Sense (1776) — political pamphlet
¶- What it is: A roughly 47-page pamphlet published anonymously in Philadelphia on 10 January 1776, arguing that reconciliation with Britain is impossible and that America's only rational course is immediate independence under a republican government. Its four sections argue in sequence: (1) society is a blessing but government at best a necessary evil, and the "mixed" English constitution is a sham; (2) monarchy and especially hereditary succession are unnatural and unscriptural absurdities; (3) the present crisis makes separation both necessary and ripe ("'Tis time to part"); (4) America has the population, resources, and potential navy to succeed alone. It became the best-selling pamphlet of the Revolution — traditional estimates run to well over 100,000 copies in 1776 alone (modern scholars debate the figures) — and decisively shifted public opinion toward independence six months before the Declaration.
- Themes & motifs: Natural rights and republican self-government; the absurdity of monarchy and hereditary rule; America as the "asylum for mankind" — a refuge for liberty with a world-historical mission; independence as plain "common sense" available to every reader, not learned doctrine; commerce and geography (a continent cannot belong to an island).
- Form & devices: Popular pamphlet rhetoric: plain diction, short declarative sentences, direct address, and rhetorical questions aimed at artisans and farmers rather than lawyers; biblical argument (Israel's demand for a king in 1 Samuel used to prove monarchy offends God) for a Bible-reading audience; homely analogy (continent/island, parent/child) turned into political logic; aphorism as a memory-device — the pamphlet is built to be quoted aloud in taverns.
- Context & significance: Paine, an English ex-corset-maker and excise officer, had arrived in Philadelphia only in late 1774 with letters of introduction from Franklin. Published after Lexington and Concord (April 1775) but before independence was respectable, Common Sense moved the debate from "rights within the empire" to separation; the Declaration of Independence followed on 4 July 1776. Distinguish it from The American Crisis (first number, December 1776), which opens "These are the times that try men's souls" — a favorite exam trap. Paine's later works: Rights of Man (1791–92), The Age of Reason (1794–95).
-
Remember:
- Published 10 January 1776, Philadelphia, anonymously (early title pages said only "Written by an Englishman").
- Four sections: origin of government / monarchy and hereditary succession / present state of American affairs / America's ability.
- Best-selling Revolutionary pamphlet; "These are the times that try men's souls" is The American Crisis, not Common Sense.
- Monarchy demolished partly through 1 Samuel 8 (Israel demanding a king); George III appears as "the Royal Brute of Britain."
-
Quotable: "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one." — "The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind." — "'Tis time to part." — "O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind."
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), explain why "Common Sense" was so effective in 1776.
Paine wrote for the common reader in plain, aphoristic English, replacing legal and classical argument with the Bible, everyday analogy, and blunt logic, so that independence could be discussed in taverns as easily as in assemblies. His timing was exact: fighting had already begun at Lexington and Concord, and the pamphlet converted an armed quarrel over colonial rights into an argument for complete separation. He also gave the cause a universal mission, presenting America as an "asylum for mankind" whose struggle was "the cause of all mankind." Enormous, rapid circulation — the largest of any pamphlet of the Revolution — turned these arguments into common property months before the Declaration of Independence.
Describe Paine's argument against monarchy and hereditary succession (min. 3 sentences).
Paine first separates society, which is produced by our wants and is a blessing, from government, which is produced by our wickedness and is at best a necessary evil — so no ruler deserves reverence in principle. Monarchy, he argues, is both unnatural and unscriptural: nature makes no man fit to rule others by birth, and in 1 Samuel God himself treats Israel's demand for a king as a sin. Hereditary succession compounds the absurdity, since even a good king cannot guarantee worthy heirs, and history shows crowns descending to fools and usurpers; Paine values "one honest man" above "all the crowned ruffians that ever lived." The English "mixed constitution" is dismissed as monarchical tyranny disguised by republican forms.
What does Paine mean by calling America an "asylum for mankind"?
Paine presents America as the refuge where the persecuted "lovers of civil and religious liberty" from every part of Europe have already fled, which is why he insists that Europe, not England, is America's true "parent country." Independence therefore matters beyond America: a free republic would keep open the world's last sanctuary for liberty at a time when, as he puts it, freedom has been hunted around the globe. The phrase universalizes the Revolution, turning a colonial dispute into an event in the history of mankind and anticipating the later idea of America as an experiment on behalf of all peoples.
Primer. American Romanticism (c. 1820–1865) turned from Enlightenment reason to imagination, emotion, nature, the past, and the individual. Its first internationally successful voice was Washington Irving; its optimistic philosophical wing was New England Transcendentalism (Emerson, Thoreau); its skeptical "dark Romantic" wing — Poe, Hawthorne, Melville — explored guilt, obsession, and the limits of human perfectibility. F. O. Matthiessen's term "American Renaissance" names the extraordinary early-1850s cluster (The Scarlet Letter 1850, Moby-Dick 1851, Walden 1854, Leaves of Grass 1855). Alongside this canon, the slave narrative — above all Douglass's — became the era's most consequential nonfiction genre, and Whitman and Dickinson established the two opposite poles (public expansiveness vs. private compression) from which modern American poetry descends.
Washington Irving — "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" (1820) — comic-Gothic tale
¶- What it is: A tale from The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent. (published in installments 1819–20), presented as "Found Among the Papers of the Late Diedrich Knickerbocker." In the drowsy Dutch community of Sleepy Hollow near Tarry Town on the Hudson, the gangling Yankee schoolmaster Ichabod Crane — singing-master, glutton, and devout believer in Cotton Mather's witchcraft lore — courts the heiress Katrina Van Tassel, with an eye on her father's overflowing farm. His rival is the burly local hero Brom Bones (Abraham Van Brunt). Riding home on the ancient horse Gunpowder from the Van Tassels' harvest party, where ghost stories included the Headless Horseman — the ghost of a Hessian trooper whose head was carried away by a cannon-ball — Ichabod is chased by the Horseman, who hurls his "head" at him. Next morning only Ichabod's hat and a shattered pumpkin are found by the church bridge; Brom, who married Katrina soon after, always "looked exceedingly knowing" when the pumpkin was mentioned, though old Dutch wives insist Ichabod was spirited away; a postscript reports the storyteller himself doubting half of it.
- Themes & motifs: Imagination and superstition versus rational (and economic) reality; the mobile, acquisitive Yankee versus the settled Dutch community — a comic contest of American cultural types; abundance and appetite (food as courtship and as real estate); storytelling and legend-making in a young nation that lacks a deep past; the mock-Gothic thrill enjoyed and simultaneously debunked.
- Form & devices: Layered frame narration — Geoffrey Crayon presents a paper of the dead antiquarian Diedrich Knickerbocker, who himself heard the tale told at a corporation meeting (the postscript) — so the "legend" reaches us third-hand and pre-doubted; sustained mock-heroic style (epic diction for a schoolmaster's appetite and a courtship); rationalized Gothic: the pumpkin and Brom's knowing look supply a natural explanation while the tale keeps its ghost; rich pictorial description (the sketch tradition); irony of the "moral" postscript.
- Context & significance: The Sketch Book made Irving the first American author with a major international (especially British) reputation — effectively the first professional American man of letters. Irving imported German folk-legend material and naturalized it in the Hudson Valley, deliberately manufacturing local legends for the new republic ("Rip Van Winkle" is the companion piece, 1819). "Knickerbocker" was already famous from his burlesque A History of New York (1809); the persona gave New York its enduring nickname.
-
Remember:
- From The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent. (1819–20); this tale appeared in the 1820 installment; written while Irving lived in England.
- Frame personas: Geoffrey Crayon (the book) and Diedrich Knickerbocker (this tale + postscript).
- The Headless Horseman is the ghost of a Hessian trooper (German mercenary of the Revolution); Ichabod's horse is Gunpowder; Ichabod is steeped in Cotton Mather's witchcraft writings.
- Ending: hat + shattered pumpkin; Brom Bones marries Katrina; Ichabod's fate left an open question (rumored later a lawyer, politician, and justice elsewhere).
- Irving = first internationally famous American author; earlier burlesque A History of New York (1809).
-
Quotable: Ichabod on horseback: "…one might have mistaken him for the genius of Famine descending upon the earth, or some scarecrow eloped from a cornfield."
Exam angles
How does the frame narration shape our reading of the supernatural events? (min. 3 sentences)
The tale is triply mediated — Crayon publishes Knickerbocker's paper, and Knickerbocker records a story he heard performed aloud — so we never receive the Horseman directly, only as circulating local legend. The postscript completes the ironic frame: the original storyteller, challenged to prove his tale, cheerfully admits he does not believe half of it himself. Inside the story, the shattered pumpkin and Brom Bones's "exceedingly knowing" look plant a rational explanation (a prank by the rival) without cancelling the ghost the community prefers. The frame thus makes the tale about how legends are made and enjoyed, not about whether ghosts exist.
In what sense is the Ichabod–Brom rivalry a contest of cultural types?
Ichabod is the itinerant Connecticut Yankee — lean, bookish, superstitious, and acquisitive, valuing the Van Tassel farm as convertible cash with which he dreams of moving west. Brom Bones is his opposite: a physically powerful, rooted Dutch local whose heroism is practical horsemanship and mischief rather than learning. Katrina and the fat abundance of the Van Tassel farm are the prize between mobility and settlement, and the community's champion wins by exploiting the intruder's own superstition. Irving plays the rivalry as comedy, but it sketches a real tension in the early republic between restless enterprise and settled tradition.
How does the story develop the motif of food and abundance?
Sleepy Hollow is introduced as a landscape of drowsy plenty, and the Van Tassel farm appears to Ichabod as a living banquet — he sees pigs as roasting pork and pigeons already in pie. His courtship of Katrina is consistently described through his appetite, so that love, hunger, and real-estate speculation become one desire. The harvest feast is the tale's set-piece, cataloguing Dutch cakes and pies at loving length just before the ghost-story session that undoes him. Appetite thus defines Ichabod's materialism and makes his final "consumption" by a pumpkin-headed spectre comically fitting.
Related topics and texts
Edgar Allan Poe — "The Black Cat" (1843) — Gothic short story
¶- What it is: First published 19 August 1843 in the Philadelphia Saturday Evening Post (then running as The United States Saturday Post). A condemned man writes on the eve of his execution — "But to-morrow I die, and to-day I would unburthen my soul" — insisting he is not mad. Once gentle and animal-loving, he degenerates through alcohol ("the Fiend Intemperance"), cuts out the eye of his favorite black cat Pluto, and later hangs the cat — because he knew it had loved him and because he knew the act was sin. His house burns that night, leaving on the one surviving wall the image of a gigantic cat in a rope. A second one-eyed black cat, marked with a white splotch that gradually assumes the shape of the GALLOWS, attaches itself to him; when his wife stops him from axing it on the cellar stairs, he buries the axe in her brain and walls her corpse up in the cellar. The police find nothing until, in a fit of bravado, he raps on the wall: a cry answers, and the wall is torn down to reveal the corpse with the living cat — walled in with the body — sitting on its head.
- Themes & motifs: "Perverseness" — the unmotivated urge to do wrong for wrong's sake and to destroy what one loves; alcoholism and domestic violence; guilt that externalizes itself and demands exposure; superstition (the witch-cat, the wife's remark) held ambiguously against psychological explanation; doubling (Pluto / the second cat; the loving husband / the murderer).
- Form & devices: Retrospective first-person confession by an unreliable narrator whose calm, reasoning tone contradicts the horror of his acts; explicit thematic essay embedded in the tale (the paragraph on "the spirit of PERVERSENESS"); Gothic apparatus turned inward — every apparently supernatural event (the fire-image, the second cat, the scream) also admits a natural or psychological reading; foreshadowing through the gallows-shaped mark; Poe's "unity of effect" — every detail bent toward a single terror.
- Context & significance: Dark Romanticism's psychology of sin and self-destruction; companion piece to "The Tell-Tale Heart" (1843) and theorized in "The Imp of the Perverse" (1845). Poe is the great theorist of the short story — his 1842 review of Hawthorne's Twice-Told Tales and "The Philosophy of Composition" (1846) demand brevity and a single preconceived effect. The temperance movement of the 1840s gives the drunkard's confession contemporary resonance.
-
Remember:
- Published 19 August 1843, Philadelphia Saturday Evening Post (United States Saturday Post).
- First cat: Pluto (named for the Roman god of the underworld); second cat: one-eyed, with a gallows-shaped white mark.
- Narrator writes on the eve of his execution; the wife-murder is committed with an axe, the corpse walled up in the cellar.
- Key concept: the spirit of PERVERSENESS; cf. "The Imp of the Perverse" (1845); "The Tell-Tale Heart" is the same year (1843).
- Poe's story theory: unity of effect ("The Philosophy of Composition," 1846; Hawthorne review, 1842).
-
Quotable: "But to-morrow I die, and to-day I would unburthen my soul." — "…hung it because I knew that it had loved me… hung it because I knew that in so doing I was committing a sin."
Exam angles
What is the effect of the first-person narration in "The Black Cat"? (min. 3 sentences)
The narrator is unreliable: he opens by denying madness and promising a plain household narrative, then recounts atrocities in the same measured, rationalizing tone. This gap between voice and deed produces the story's central irony and forces the reader into the diagnostic position the narrator refuses to occupy. Because everything — the fire-image, the second cat, the final scream — reaches us only through his perception, Poe can keep natural and supernatural explanations in perfect suspension. The confession form (written the day before his execution) also turns the tale into a study of guilt that must speak, anticipating the ending in which his own bravado betrays him.
How does the story develop the motif of perverseness?
Poe has the narrator define perverseness explicitly as "one of the primitive impulses of the human heart" — the longing to do wrong for wrong's sake. The motif then escalates in stages: gouging out Pluto's eye, hanging the cat precisely because it loved him and because it was sin, the axe-murder of his wife when she blocks a lesser violence, and finally the gratuitous rap on the cellar wall that summons the police to his crime. Each act is more self-destructive than the last, so perverseness reveals itself as an unconscious drive toward exposure and punishment. What begins as cruelty against the loving cat ends as the narrator's judicial suicide.
What is the function of the second cat?
The second cat doubles Pluto — black, one-eyed, affectionate — and thus visibly resurrects the narrator's crime; its single difference, the white splotch, gradually resolves into the image of the gallows, externalizing his guilt as a legible sign. Whether it is a revenant or an ordinary stray transformed by the narrator's projection is deliberately undecidable, which is exactly Poe's point about the guilty mind. Walled up alive with the corpse, the cat becomes the literal voice of the repressed crime, and its "informing" cry executes the justice the narrator's perverseness has been courting all along.
Related topics and texts
Nathaniel Hawthorne — "The Birth-Mark" (1843) — allegorical short story
¶- What it is: First published in The Pioneer (March 1843) and collected in Mosses from an Old Manse (1846). The brilliant scientist Aylmer marries the beautiful Georgiana, then becomes obsessed with the one flaw on her otherwise perfect face: a tiny crimson birthmark shaped like a hand. To him it is "the fatal flaw of humanity," the visible grip of earthly imperfection; a dream shows him cutting it away until the knife reaches her heart. Georgiana, made to loathe the mark by his horror, submits to its removal in his laboratory, attended by the shaggy, earthy assistant Aminadab, who mutters that if she were his wife he would never part with it. Reading Aylmer's journal, she discovers his career is a record of glorious failures, yet drinks his elixir anyway. The mark fades — and as its last crimson tint disappears, Georgiana dies, the mark having been "the bond by which an angelic spirit kept itself in union with a mortal frame"; Aminadab's hoarse chuckle closes the experiment.
- Themes & motifs: The fatal pursuit of perfection — mortality and imperfection as the very condition of being human; science as Faustian overreach against Nature; spirit versus matter (Aylmer/Aminadab); the male idealization and control of the female body — Georgiana is perfected out of existence; the complicity of the victim who internalizes the ideal.
- Form & devices: Third-person narration with an intrusive moralizing narrator (Hawthorne's tales openly interpret themselves); allegory and symbol: the hand-shaped mark condenses mortality, earthliness, sexuality, and Nature's grip; character allegory in the Aylmer (intellect/spirit) — Aminadab (body/earth) pairing; proleptic dream; irony of the ending — total success is total loss; the "romance" mode: psychological truth in frankly symbolic settings.
- Context & significance: Central dark-Romantic rejoinder to both Transcendental perfectibility and the era's scientific utopianism: human beings cannot be purified of earth without being destroyed. Companion piece: "Rappaccini's Daughter" (1844), another laboratory-destroyed woman. Hawthorne's Puritan inheritance (an ancestor, John Hathorne, judged the Salem witch trials) underlies his lifelong subject of secret sin and moral pride; The Scarlet Letter follows in 1850.
-
Remember:
- The Pioneer, March 1843; collected in Mosses from an Old Manse (1846).
- Characters: Aylmer (scientist), Georgiana (wife), Aminadab (earthy laboratory assistant).
- The mark: a tiny crimson hand on Georgiana's left cheek; visible when she pales, fading when she blushes.
- Ending: the elixir works, the mark fades, Georgiana dies; Aminadab laughs.
- Movement label: dark Romanticism; anti-perfectibility, anti-scientific-hubris allegory.
-
Quotable: Aminadab: "If she were my wife, I'd never part with that birthmark." — "It was the fatal flaw of humanity which Nature, in one shape or another, stamps ineffaceably on all her productions." — "The fatal hand had grappled with the mystery of life, and was the bond by which an angelic spirit kept itself in union with a mortal frame."
Exam angles
What does the birthmark symbolize? (min. 3 sentences)
The crimson hand is Hawthorne's symbol for human imperfection itself — the mark Nature "stamps ineffaceably on all her productions" to sign them as mortal and earthly. Its hand shape suggests the grip of the flesh: birth, sexuality, and death all hold Georgiana through it, which is why the narrator calls it the bond keeping her angelic spirit united with a mortal frame. To Aylmer it symbolizes everything his science cannot tolerate — the given, the imperfect, the bodily — so removing it necessarily removes her life. The symbol also carries a gendered meaning: the "flaw" exists chiefly in the male idealist's gaze, which cannot love an actual, imperfect woman.
Characterize the function of Aminadab.
Aminadab is Aylmer's allegorical opposite: shaggy, grimy, and physically strong, he represents "man's physical nature," while Aylmer is the type of the spirit and intellect. Precisely because he is earthy, he possesses the wisdom Aylmer lacks, muttering that if Georgiana were his wife he would never part with the birthmark. His readiness to serve the experiment he silently disapproves of shows matter obeying mind, but his "hoarse, chuckling laugh" at Georgiana's death gives gross earth the last word over aspiring spirit. Through him Hawthorne dramatizes the story's dualism without a single authorial sermon.
How does "The Birth-Mark" criticize scientific idealism? (min. 3 sentences)
Aylmer belongs to the Faustian line of seekers who love science "as a rival to love itself," and his marriage becomes an experiment in which the wife is raw material. Hawthorne undermines his brilliance in advance: Georgiana's reading of his journal reveals a career of magnificent failures, each success "a failure compared with the ideal at which he aimed." The catastrophe therefore is not an accident but the logic of perfectionism — to perfect a mortal creature is to kill it, since imperfection is the condition of earthly life. The closing moral states that a profounder wisdom would have accepted the best the earth could offer instead of demanding heaven's standard in the present.
Related topics and texts
Frederick Douglass — Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (1845) — slave narrative (autobiography)
¶- What it is: Autobiography "Written by Himself," published in Boston by the Anti-Slavery Office in 1845, with a preface by William Lloyd Garrison and a letter by Wendell Phillips authenticating the author. Douglass records his birth in Talbot County, Maryland (c. 1818; enslaved people were kept ignorant of their birthdays), his scarcely known mother and unknown white father, and the whipping of his Aunt Hester — the "blood-stained gate" through which he entered slavery's hell. Sent to Baltimore, he begins learning letters from Sophia Auld until her husband Hugh forbids it, unwittingly teaching Douglass that literacy is "the pathway from slavery to freedom"; he continues secretly (white street boys, The Columbian Orator, shipyard letters). Hired out to the "slave-breaker" Edward Covey, he is whipped weekly until, at sixteen, he physically resists Covey in a two-hour fight — the turning point "how a slave was made a man" — and is never whipped again. After a betrayed escape plot (1836) and caulker's work in Baltimore, he escapes on 3 September 1838 (method deliberately withheld), marries Anna Murray, settles in New Bedford as "Frederick Douglass" (renamed after a hero of Scott's The Lady of the Lake), and is discovered by the abolitionist movement; an appendix distinguishes the "Christianity of Christ" from the slaveholding "Christianity of this land."
- Themes & motifs: Literacy and knowledge as the road to freedom; slavery as a system that dehumanizes slaveholders too (Sophia Auld's corruption from kindness to cruelty); manhood and selfhood won through resistance before legal emancipation; religious hypocrisy of the slaveholding South; the destruction of family; songs of the enslaved as testimony of sorrow, not contentment; naming and self-authorship.
- Form & devices: First-person retrospective narrative combining documentary precision (names, places, dates — a public indictment) with rhetorical set-pieces: the chiasmus ("man made a slave / slave made a man"), the apostrophe to the white-sailed ships on Chesapeake Bay, biblical cadence and irony. It codified the slave-narrative genre conventions: white-authored authenticating documents; the "I was born" opening with unknown birthdate; the literacy scene; the violent turning point; the escape whose method is concealed to protect others; the new name; the anti-slaveholding-religion appendix.
- Context & significance: The most famous and rhetorically accomplished American slave narrative and a foundational text of African American literature. Publishing it exposed the fugitive author — Douglass lectured in Britain (1845–47) until English friends purchased his legal freedom (1846); he founded The North Star (1847) and rewrote his life twice (My Bondage and My Freedom, 1855; Life and Times, 1881/1892). The book's very existence, "Written by Himself," refuted the propaganda that Africans could not master letters.
-
Remember:
- Published 1845, Boston, Anti-Slavery Office; preface by Garrison, letter by Wendell Phillips; subtitle "Written by Himself."
- Born c. 1818 in Talbot County, Maryland, as Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey; escaped 3 September 1838; renamed from Scott's Lady of the Lake.
- Key episodes: Aunt Hester's whipping; Sophia/Hugh Auld literacy scene; The Columbian Orator; the fight with Edward Covey; the appendix on religion.
- Later: The North Star (1847); two expanded autobiographies (1855, 1881/92).
-
Quotable: "You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man." — "It was the blood-stained gate, the entrance to the hell of slavery, through which I was about to pass." — "From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom." — Appendix: "…between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference…"
Exam angles
How does the Narrative develop the motif of literacy? (min. 3 sentences)
Literacy enters as a gift — Sophia Auld begins teaching the boy his letters — and is immediately criminalized when Hugh Auld forbids it, arguing that learning would spoil a slave forever. Douglass grasps the prohibition as revelation: from that moment he understands "the pathway from slavery to freedom," and he pursues reading covertly through white street boys, The Columbian Orator, and copied shipyard letters. Knowledge first brings torment — he can now name his condition without being able to change it — but it also supplies the arguments, the forged passes of the 1836 plot, and finally the Narrative itself. The subtitle "Written by Himself" completes the motif: the literate ex-slave becomes the author of his own life and evidence against slavery's central lie.
Describe the genre conventions of the slave narrative that the text exemplifies.
The Narrative opens with white authentication — Garrison's preface and Phillips's letter — vouching that the fugitive author truly wrote it, and with the formulaic "I was born," followed by the telling admission that no slave knows his birthday. It proceeds through the genre's canonical stations: scenes of witnessed violence, the forbidden acquisition of literacy, the crisis of resistance (the Covey fight), and the escape, whose method is withheld so as not to close the route for others. It ends with the free man renamed and self-defined, plus an appendix attacking slaveholding religion to forestall the charge of irreligion. Douglass follows the pattern so powerfully that his book became the model by which the genre is defined.
What is the significance of the fight with Covey? (min. 3 sentences)
Douglass frames the two-hour fight with the professional "slave-breaker" as the exact reversal of his enslavement, in the famous chiasmus "how a man was made a slave… how a slave was made a man." The victory is psychological before it is physical: it revives his crushed spirit, restores his "own manhood," and replaces the fear of death with resolve, so that although he remains legally enslaved for years, he is never whipped again. The episode argues that freedom begins as an inner act of resistance rather than a legal event. It also quietly discredits superstition — Sandy's protective root — in favor of self-assertion as the true source of power.
Walt Whitman — "When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer" (1865) — free-verse lyric
¶- What it is: An eight-line free-verse poem first published in Drum-Taps (1865), Whitman's Civil War volume, and later absorbed into Leaves of Grass, where it stands in the "By the Roadside" cluster. Four anaphoric "When…" lines pile up the astronomer's lecture — proofs, figures, charts and diagrams, applause in the lecture-room — until the speaker becomes "tired and sick," rises, glides out alone into "the mystical moist night-air," and looks up "in perfect silence at the stars." The entire poem is a single sentence whose grammar delays release until the escape it describes. (The exam list spells "Learned"; Whitman's text has the elided "Learn'd.")
- Themes & motifs: Direct, unmediated experience versus secondhand analytic knowledge; Romantic/Transcendentalist intuition set against Enlightenment measurement; the individual versus the applauding crowd; nature as the true lecture hall; silence versus noise, night versus lamplit room.
- Form & devices: Whitman's free verse — no regular metrical scheme or end-rhyme, lines swelling and contracting organically (the longest lines belong to the lecture, the calm final line is short); anaphora and parallelism ("When… When… When… When…") that mimic the additive tedium of data; a single periodic sentence with the turn at "Till rising and gliding out"; sensory contrast (dry figures / "mystical moist night-air"); the pun in "unaccountable" — the speaker's sickness cannot be counted or charted; "perfect silence" answering "much applause."
- Context & significance: Leaves of Grass (first edition 1855, twelve untitled poems, self-published; endlessly revised until the 1891–92 "deathbed" edition) answered Emerson's call for an American poet with a democratic, all-including free verse. This poem is the classic set text for that formal revolution and for the Romantic hierarchy of experience over instruction — though it dramatizes the limits of mediated knowledge rather than attacking science as such. Drum-Taps grew from Whitman's volunteer service in Washington's war hospitals.
-
Remember:
- First published in Drum-Taps (1865); later placed in the "By the Roadside" cluster of Leaves of Grass.
- 8 lines, one sentence, free verse; four-fold anaphora "When…"; turn at "Till rising and gliding out."
- Leaves of Grass: first edition 1855; revised through the 1891–92 deathbed edition.
- Do not confuse: the poem is not in the 1855 first edition — it is a Civil War–era poem.
-
Quotable: "When I heard the learn'd astronomer," … "Look'd up in perfect silence at the stars."
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), describe the theme(s) of "When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer."
The poem opposes two ways of knowing the universe: the astronomer's mediated knowledge of proofs, figures, and charts, and the speaker's direct, wordless contemplation of the night sky. Learning delivered secondhand in the applauding lecture-room makes the speaker "tired and sick," while unmeasured experience outdoors restores him — a Romantic and Transcendentalist hierarchy of intuition over analysis. The poem also sets the solitary individual against the crowd, since the speaker must leave the audience to meet the stars alone. It does not deny the truth of astronomy; it insists that tabulated truth is not yet experience, and that wonder requires "perfect silence."
How does the form of the poem enact its meaning?
The first four lines are chained by the anaphora "When…," and their swelling length imitates the additive, quantifying drone of the lecture with its columns of figures. The whole poem is one suspended sentence, so the reader is held in the lecture-room grammatically until the turn "Till rising and gliding out" releases both speaker and syntax. The later lines contract from the long lecture-room line, and the final line closes on "the stars" in "perfect silence". It is not the poem's shortest line: the effect comes from contrast with the crowded middle, the slower phrasing and the shift from explanation to looking. Free verse allows that changing pace; it does not mean that the language has no rhythm.
Is the poem an attack on science? Explain (min. 3 sentences).
Read carefully, the poem criticizes not astronomy but the substitution of representation for experience: the speaker sickens in the lecture-room, yet what he finally looks at is exactly the astronomer's subject. Whitman targets the scene of mediated, applauded knowledge — proofs and diagrams received passively in a crowd — as spiritually insufficient. The stars remain available to both kinds of attention, but only "perfect silence" yields the mystical contact the poem values. The claim is therefore epistemological rather than anti-scientific: counting cannot exhaust the "unaccountable."
Related topics and texts
Emily Dickinson — "I never saw a Moor" (c. 1865, published 1890) — lyric poem
¶- What it is: A two-quatrain poem (Johnson no. 1052 / Franklin no. 800; the manuscript, Amherst 237, is a pencil draft of c. 1865) first published posthumously in Poems (1890), the debut selection edited by Mabel Loomis Todd and T. W. Higginson, in its "Time and Eternity" section. The argument is an analogy of faith: the speaker has never seen a moor or the sea, yet knows what heather and a billow look like; likewise she has never spoken with God nor visited Heaven, yet is as certain of the spot "As if the Checks were given." The first editors smoothed her text — "Billow" became "wave must," "Checks" became "chart," dashes became commas — a textbook case of how the 1890s editions domesticated Dickinson.
- Themes & motifs: Faith as inference and analogy rather than empirical proof; the reach of imagination beyond experience (the speaker claims knowledge without direct observation; do not turn that statement into an unverified claim about the author’s reading or travel); certainty shadowed by the conditional "As if"; the domestication of the transcendent in a homely travel metaphor (a ticketed journey to a guaranteed destination).
- Form & devices: Hymn-derived short metre: the opening quatrain scans approximately 6-6-8-6 syllables (three, three, four, three iambic feet), not common metre’s 8-6-8-6; the second quatrain follows that pattern with a possible extra syllable in “Heaven.” The rhyme is ABCB; two exactly parallel stanzas moving from nature (moor/sea) to the supernatural (God/Heaven) — analogy as structure; Dickinson's signature dashes, capitalized nouns, and compression; the "Checks" metaphor: the railway checks or tickets handed to a passenger, tokens that guarantee arrival — faith holds the ticket though the destination is unseen (some read bank checks; the travel reading is standard); the "As if" that both asserts and quietly suspends certainty.
- Context & significance: Dickinson (1830–1886, Amherst, Massachusetts) wrote nearly 1,800 poems (1,789 in R. W. Franklin's 1998 variorum edition), of which fewer than a dozen were published during her lifetime; her poems also circulated privately in letters. Publication history and permission are more complicated than a blanket claim that every appearance was unauthorized. After her death her sister Lavinia found the manuscripts, many sewn into the little booklets called fascicles; Todd and Higginson's Poems (1890) began her fame, and Thomas H. Johnson’s 1955 edition and R. W. Franklin’s later editions are major stages in their scholarly editing. This poem is the anthology piece for her hymn-meter faith poems — and, with its altered lines, for the whole editorial history.
-
Remember:
- Written c. 1865; published posthumously in Poems (1890), ed. Todd & Higginson; Johnson 1052 / Franklin 800.
- Short-metre pattern (6-6-8-6 in the first quatrain), ABCB; two parallel quatrains: nature → God. Scan the given text before applying a general description of Dickinson’s style.
- Editors changed "Billow" → "wave must" and "Checks" → "chart" in 1890.
- ~1,800 poems (1,789 in Franklin's 1998 edition); only about ten published in her lifetime, all anonymously; fascicles; Johnson's scholarly edition 1955.
-
Quotable: "I never saw a Moor — / I never saw the Sea — / Yet know I how the Heather looks / And what a Billow be." (manuscript/Johnson text; the 1890 editors printed "wave must be" and, later in the poem, "chart" for "Checks")
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), describe the theme(s) of "I never saw a Moor."
The poem argues for knowledge without direct experience: never having seen a moor or the sea, the speaker nevertheless knows heather and billow, because imagination and report suffice. The second stanza transfers this logic to religion — never having spoken with God or visited Heaven, she is still "certain of the spot" — making faith an act of confident inference rather than proof. At the same time the closing "As if the Checks were given" keeps the certainty conditional: the ticket of assurance is imagined, not actually in hand. The poem thus balances serene declaration of faith with Dickinson's characteristic sliver of doubt.
What do the "Checks" in the final line refer to?
The "Checks" are the tokens of rail travel — the checks or tickets a conductor gives passengers, guaranteeing that they and their baggage will reach the destination. The speaker is as sure of Heaven's "spot" as a traveler holding such checks, so the metaphor domesticates salvation into a booked journey. Dickinson's first editors found the word so odd that the 1890 text prints "As if the chart were given," which flattens the image into a map; the manuscript reading was restored by later scholarly editions. The homely commercial metaphor is typical of Dickinson's habit of figuring the transcendent through everyday New England objects.
How does the poem's form relate to the hymn tradition?
The poem uses a hymn-derived short-metre pattern: its first quatrain has approximately 6-6-8-6 syllables, with a longer third line, and ABCB rhyme. Calling this particular poem regular 8-6-8-6 common metre would misdescribe its first line. The form suits the content, since the poem performs an act of faith much like a hymn's profession. But Dickinson privatizes the public form: dashes interrupt the confident flow, capitalized nouns ("Moor," "Billow," "Checks") turn doctrine into personal emblem, and the final simile replaces scriptural authority with a railway ticket. The hymn stanza thus becomes a vehicle for individual, slightly heterodox devotion rather than congregational certainty.
Interpretation: A conditional phrase can support a reading of tension within faith, but does not prove that Dickinson personally disbelieved.
Related topics and texts
Herman Melville — "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-Street" (1853) — short story
¶- What it is: Published anonymously in two installments in Putnam's Monthly Magazine (November and December 1853) and collected in The Piazza Tales (1856). An elderly, "eminently safe" Wall Street lawyer — a Master in Chancery — narrates his experience with the copyist he once employed alongside the comic clerks Turkey, Nippers, and the boy Ginger Nut. The pale scrivener Bartleby at first copies mechanically day and night, then answers a request to proofread with "I would prefer not to," and by degrees prefers not to do anything — including copying, leaving the office (he lives there, as a Sunday visit reveals), or quitting. Unable to force or bribe him out, the lawyer finally moves his own offices; the new tenants have Bartleby removed to the Tombs prison as a vagrant, where, preferring not to dine, he is found dead, curled at the base of the prison wall ("With kings and counselors," murmurs the narrator — an allusion to Job). An epilogue reports the one rumor of his past: he had been a clerk in the Dead Letter Office at Washington. The story ends: "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!"
- Themes & motifs: Alienated clerical labor in the world of Wall Street — the office as enclosure (walls, screens, dead walls, the Tombs); passive resistance and radical negation — the power and cost of "preferring not to"; the limits of prudent Christian charity (the narrator's benevolence is real but self-regarding and finally helpless); failed communication (dead letters); the inscrutability of the other person.
- Form & devices: First-person retrospective narration by the lawyer, who is as much the story's subject as Bartleby: genial, self-justifying, quietly self-interested, and never granted access to Bartleby's interior; the unvarying formula "I would prefer not to" with its polite conditional — repetition as both comedy and horror (the word "prefer" even infects the other clerks' speech); the humor-character pairing of Turkey and Nippers (useful only half the day each); pervasive wall symbolism down to the subtitle "A Story of Wall-Street"; the withheld backstory delivered only as rumor, keeping the tale a parable open to existentialist, Marxist, Christian, and biographical readings.
- Context & significance: Written after the commercial failure of Moby-Dick (1851) and Pierre (1852) had wrecked Melville's career, when he turned to anonymous magazine fiction (this and "Benito Cereno" are the masterpieces of that period, both in The Piazza Tales, 1856). The story is now read as a proto-modernist parable of the office and of absurd resistance — an American anticipation of Kafka — and its refuser has been claimed as a cousin of Thoreau's civil disobedience.
-
Remember:
- Putnam's Monthly Magazine, November–December 1853, anonymous; collected in The Piazza Tales (1856).
- Narrator: unnamed Wall Street lawyer, a Master in Chancery; office staff: Turkey, Nippers, Ginger Nut.
- Bartleby dies in the Tombs (New York prison), refusing food; the narrator's Job allusion: "With kings and counselors."
- Epilogue rumor: Bartleby had worked in the Dead Letter Office in Washington.
- Melville's career context: post–Moby-Dick (1851) failure; magazine period 1853–56.
-
Quotable: "I would prefer not to." — "On errands of life, these letters speed to death." — "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!"
Exam angles
What is the effect of making the lawyer, not Bartleby, the narrator? (min. 3 sentences)
Because the story reaches us only through the complacent lawyer, Bartleby remains permanently opaque — we get his formula but never his motives, which preserves the tale as a parable rather than a case history. The narration simultaneously exposes the narrator: his charity is genuine yet always audited ("a sweet morsel for my conscience"), and his ultimate solution is to move away from the problem, so the story becomes a study of respectable benevolence meeting absolute need. His mixture of irritation, fascination, and guilt models the reader's own response. The final cry "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!" marks how far the safe man has been dragged toward tragic knowledge — and how little he could do with it.
How does the story develop the motif of walls?
The subtitle "A Story of Wall-Street" announces the motif: the office windows face a white wall and a black wall, Bartleby works behind a screen facing a "dead wall," and his trances are called "dead-wall reveries." The wall is the story's image for the enclosures of modern clerical life — partitions of labor, class, and privacy that keep men from one another. Bartleby's trajectory simply makes the metaphor literal, ending in the Tombs, where he dies curled at the base of the prison wall. The Dead Letter Office rumor completes the pattern: even language, the last opening between people, arrives walled off from its addressees.
What does the Dead Letter Office epilogue contribute to the meaning of the story?
The epilogue offers the narrator's single rumor of a cause: Bartleby had sorted and burned undeliverable mail, handling rings, banknotes, and pardons that reached no one — "on errands of life, these letters speed to death." As an explanation it is explicitly uncertain, so it satisfies the narrator's need for meaning while leaving Bartleby's negation unexplained at bottom. Symbolically, however, it generalizes the story: all human communication risks becoming a dead letter, every charity may arrive too late. That is why the closing apostrophe widens from the man to the species — "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!"
Primer. After the Civil War, American fiction turned from romance to Realism (c. 1865–1900): ordinary characters, credible social detail, moral complexity without authorial melodrama (Howells, Twain, James). Its regional branch, local color, recorded the speech, customs, and landscapes of particular regions — Kate Chopin's Creole and Acadian Louisiana is a prime example — often in short stories for magazines. Chopin joined local color to an unprecedented frankness about women's inner lives, which is why she is read today as a proto-feminist (culminating in The Awakening, 1899, whose scandalized reception ended her career; she died in 1904 and was fully rehabilitated only in the late 1960s). Ambrose Bierce, a Civil War veteran, stands at realism's dark edge: his war stories strip combat of romance with a cold irony that already points toward naturalism.
Kate Chopin — "A Respectable Woman" (1894) — short story
¶- What it is: Published in Vogue (February 1894) and collected in A Night in Acadie (1897). Mrs. Baroda is mildly annoyed that her husband Gaston has invited his college friend Gouvernail, a New Orleans journalist, for a week or two at their sugar plantation. The guest confounds her expectations by being quiet, unglamorous, and indifferent to her charms, and her puzzlement shades into obsessive attention. One night on a dark bench he sits beside her and murmurs a fragment of Whitman — "'Night of south winds — night of the large few stars! / Still nodding night —'" — and talks freely of his youth; she is seized by physical desire, longs to touch him, and, being a respectable woman, flees to the city until he leaves. She then opposes his ever returning — until, near the year's end, she herself proposes a new visit, laughing over her husband's delight and pressing a kiss on his lips: "I have overcome everything! you will see. This time I shall be very nice to him." The famous ambiguity: has she overcome the desire — or the scruples?
- Themes & motifs: Female sexual desire inside a contented marriage; "respectability" as social mask and self-description; repression, self-command, and their possible collapse; the unknowability of a wife's inner life to a cheerfully oblivious husband; night, cigar smoke, and murmured poetry as the sensory language of temptation.
- Form & devices: Third-person narration limited to Mrs. Baroda with free indirect discourse rendering what she will not say aloud; radical economy (a few pages) with the crisis displaced into atmosphere rather than event; the Whitman allusion (from "Song of Myself," section 21) as erotic code — the poem says what neither character may; the open ending built on one polysemous sentence, an irony Chopin refuses to resolve; the title as a question the story asks rather than a fact it states.
- Context & significance: Vogue published Chopin's boldest work in the 1890s. The story shows local color (Louisiana plantation setting) shading into psychological realism, and it is a compact example of Chopin's proto-feminist theme: the respectable woman discovers her desire as a fact requiring management, not a sin requiring confession. Gouvernail reappears in "Athénaïse" and briefly in The Awakening — a favorite identification question.
-
Remember:
- Vogue, February 1894; collected in A Night in Acadie (1897).
- The guest Gouvernail quotes Whitman, "Song of Myself" (section 21): "Night of south winds — night of the large few stars!"
- Ending line: "I have overcome everything! … This time I shall be very nice to him." — deliberately double-edged.
- Gouvernail recurs in "Athénaïse" and in The Awakening.
-
Quotable: "'Night of south winds — night of the large few stars! / Still nodding night —'" (Gouvernail's Whitman); "I have overcome everything! you will see. This time I shall be very nice to him."
Exam angles
What does Gouvernail's quotation refer to, and what does it accomplish in the story?
Gouvernail murmurs two lines from section 21 of Whitman's "Song of Myself," an apostrophe to the "mad naked summer night" of the American South. The allusion reveals the quiet guest's hidden sensuous inwardness — he is not dull but self-contained — and it functions as the story's only open articulation of the desire flooding Mrs. Baroda as she sits beside him in the dark. Whitman, the poet of the body, thus says what an 1894 magazine story could not say directly about a married woman's arousal. The borrowed voice also keeps both characters technically innocent: nothing improper is spoken, yet everything improper is communicated.
Interpret the final sentence of the story (min. 3 sentences).
The ending is a controlled double meaning: "I have overcome everything" may announce that Mrs. Baroda has conquered her infatuation and can now safely be hospitable, or that she has overcome the scruples — her "respectability" — that made her flee Gouvernail. Chopin tilts the second reading with erotic signals: the proposal is hers, she speaks "laughingly" after a long, tender kiss, and the promise "this time I shall be very nice to him" glitters with innuendo. Yet the surface remains blameless, so the respectable woman's mask stays intact for her husband and for any censorious reader. The irony makes the reader, not the author, responsible for the scandalous interpretation.
How does Chopin convey female desire within the propriety of the 1890s?
Desire is rendered almost entirely through free indirect discourse and displacement: Mrs. Baroda's irritation, her compulsive analysis of the guest, and her impulse to touch him in the dark stand in for any explicit statement. The sensory setting — night air, the drift of cigar smoke, a murmured poem — carries the erotic charge, and her sudden flight to the city functions as the plot-level euphemism for temptation nearly yielded to. The husband's cheerful obliviousness measures how invisible this inner life is to the social world. Chopin thus writes a story about sexuality in which nothing improper ever happens — except in the only place that matters, the heroine's consciousness.
Related topics and texts
Kate Chopin — "Désirée's Baby" (1893) — local-color short story
¶- What it is: Published in Vogue on 14 January 1893 under the title "The Father of Désirée's Baby" (the form on the exam list) and collected in Bayou Folk (1894). In antebellum Creole Louisiana, Désirée — a foundling discovered as a toddler by the pillar of the Valmondé gate and raised as the Valmondés' daughter — is passionately married by Armand Aubigny, master of the gloomy plantation L'Abri and bearer of one of the oldest names in Louisiana. After the birth of their son Armand is transformed by pride and love — until, at three months, the baby's appearance, set beside the quadroon nurse's boy, reveals African ancestry. Armand coldly tells Désirée "It means… that the child is not white; it means that you are not white," and, when her mother writes "Come home to Valmondé," sends wife and child away; Désirée walks with the baby into the bayou and does not come back. Weeks later, burning her corbeille, layette, and letters in a great bonfire, Armand finds a fragment of an old letter from his mother to his father: she thanks God that "our dear Armand will never know that his mother, who adores him, belongs to the race that is cursed with the brand of slavery."
- Themes & motifs: Race as a social construction enforced by the one-drop logic of slavery — status that a single suspicion can revoke overnight; the fusion of racial and patriarchal power (Armand's name decides what his wife is); unknown origins versus hidden origins; pride destroying love; slavery's everyday cruelty (Armand's "strict" rule; the presence of La Blanche); providence and its ironies (the foundling "sent by a beneficent Providence").
- Form & devices: Third-person narration with shifting focalization (notably Madame Valmondé's early shudder at L'Abri and at the baby — the reader is given clues before Désirée sees them); the Maupassant-style twist ending through a withheld document, which converts the story's dramatic irony into a verdict on Armand and on racial essentialism itself; symbolism: L'Abri ("the shelter") that shelters no one, its black-pall roof and shadowing oaks; the stone pillar (origin, foundling, fixity); the October bonfire as auto-da-fé of a marriage; the bayou as erasure; names (Désirée = "the desired one"). Chopin translated Maupassant and learned the conte's economy from him.
- Context & significance: The most anthologized American treatment of racial "passing" avant la lettre and a peak of local color used for tragedy: the Creole hierarchy of white, quadroon, and enslaved supplies the machinery of destruction. Setting the story in the antebellum past gave Chopin's 1890s readers a safe distance from a critique that lands squarely on racial categories as such. Note the ambiguity often set as a question: the text implies but never states Désirée's death, and Armand's own knowledge remains debatable (did he know of his ancestry? the letter's placement "in the drawer" leaves a sliver of doubt).
-
Remember:
- Vogue, 14 January 1893, as "The Father of Désirée's Baby"; collected in Bayou Folk (1894).
- Names: Désirée (foundling of the Valmondés), Armand Aubigny, plantation L'Abri ("the shelter"), the quadroon nurse boy.
- Twist: the final letter from Armand's mother establishes African ancestry on his side. Désirée's parentage remains unknown; the letter exposes his unjustified blame without resolving her ancestry.
- Set before the Civil War (antebellum), written 1892; Maupassant-style twist ending.
-
Quotable: "It means," he answered lightly, "that the child is not white; it means that you are not white." — "…our dear Armand will never know that his mother, who adores him, belongs to the race that is cursed with the brand of slavery."
Exam angles
Describe the irony of the story's ending (min. 3 sentences).
The ending is a double irony: Armand has destroyed his wife and son for an African ancestry that, the last letter reveals, is his own inheritance from the mother who adored him. The revelation arrives only after the human cost is unrecoverable — Désirée and the baby have vanished into the bayou — so knowledge and punishment coincide. Retrospectively the irony rewrites every detail the reader accepted: Armand's dark skin beside Désirée's whiteness, his notorious harshness to "his negroes," his burning need to obliterate the evidence. Because he condemned by category rather than fact, the twist convicts not just one cruel man but the racial logic that let a name and a suspicion define a human being.
How does the story present race as a social construction?
Désirée's status shows race functioning as ascription rather than essence: an origin-less foundling becomes "white" by adoption into the Valmondé name, and the "proudest" marriage in Louisiana ratifies it. One visible baby reverses everything — without proof, testimony, or change in Désirée herself, Armand's sentence "you are not white" suffices to expel her from whiteness, wifehood, and life. The final letter completes the demonstration, since the ancestry actually runs through Armand, whose name and power had made him immune to suspicion. Race in the story is thus a system of power administered by white patriarchs, not a biological fact — which is exactly what makes it lethal.
What is the symbolic function of L'Abri and its imagery?
L'Abri means "the shelter," and the irony of the name organizes the story: the house that should protect the family destroys it. Madame Valmondé shudders at first sight of the place, whose black-shingled roof descends "like a pall" beneath the shadow of great solemn oaks — funeral imagery planted long before any death. Its gloom also reflects its master: the narration notes that Armand's rule made his slaves forget how to be gay, aligning the house with the regime of slavery it embodies. When the bonfire of Désirée's corbeille and letters burns in its yard, the "shelter" openly becomes a place of ritual destruction.
Related topics and texts
Kate Chopin — "The Story of an Hour" (1894) — short short story
¶- What it is: Published in Vogue on 6 December 1894 as "The Dream of an Hour"; about a thousand words covering a single hour. Because Louise Mallard is "afflicted with a heart trouble," her sister Josephine and her husband's friend Richards break gently the news that Brently Mallard has died in a railroad disaster. Louise weeps at once, then withdraws alone to her room, where, facing the open window full of spring life — treetops, rain-smell, sparrows, patches of blue sky — something approaches her and she yields to it, whispering "free, free, free!" She exults in the years ahead that will belong to herself alone, acknowledging that she had loved him — sometimes — but that love counts for little beside self-possession ("Free! Body and soul free!"). Descending the stairs "like a goddess of Victory," she sees the front door open: Brently walks in, unharmed and ignorant of any accident. Louise drops dead, and the doctors conclude she died "of heart disease — of the joy that kills."
- Themes & motifs: Marriage as benevolent repression — even kind intentions impose "a powerful will bending hers"; selfhood and freedom as the deepest female desire; the heart as literal organ and symbol of a constrained life; spring vitality versus the closed house; time compressed into a single revelatory hour; the world's inability to read a woman's inner truth.
- Form & devices: Third-person limited narration with free indirect discourse tracking Louise's transformation; extreme compression and a double reversal (death news → liberation; resurrection → death); layered irony — situational (the "dead" man lives, the living woman dies) and dramatic (the doctors’ explanation is undermined by the reader’s access to Louise’s earlier response; loss of anticipated freedom is a strong interpretation, not a clinically established cause); symbolism of the open window (future, spring, freedom) versus the closed door and the stairs down into the social world; the withheld name (she is "Mrs. Mallard" until her hour of selfhood makes her "Louise").
- Context & significance: Now Chopin's most anthologized story and a foundational text of American feminist literary study, though its cold-eyed view of even a kind marriage disturbed contemporary editors. Its rediscovery came with the Chopin revival around Per Seyersted's Complete Works (1969). The one-hour frame makes it the standard classroom example of compression and irony in the American short story.
-
Remember:
- Vogue, 6 December 1894, original title "The Dream of an Hour."
- Characters: Louise Mallard (heart trouble), Brently Mallard, sister Josephine, friend Richards.
- Final line: died "of heart disease — of the joy that kills."
- Story time ≈ one hour; the twist depends on a false casualty report from a railroad disaster.
-
Quotable: "free, free, free!" — "When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease — of the joy that kills."
Exam angles
Explain the irony of the final line (min. 3 sentences).
The doctors' diagnosis — death from "the joy that kills" — assumes Louise's heart failed from happiness at seeing her husband alive. The reader has shared Louise's delight in an independent future, so the return of her husband strongly supports a contrary interpretation: the anticipated freedom has suddenly vanished. The narration does not enter her mind at the moment of death, however, so this is an interpretation of the irony, not a medically established cause. The line is therefore dramatic irony sharpened into social criticism, since the doctors merely state what a wife is expected to feel. The misreading survives her, so the world that never knew her remains intact — which is the story's bleakest point.
What does the open window symbolize? (min. 3 sentences)
The open window frames everything Louise's marriage has closed off: quivering new spring life in the treetops, rain-freshened air, birdsong, and patches of blue sky through the clouds. Facing it in her armchair, she receives her revelation "through the sounds, the scents, the colour" — freedom arrives as sensory spring, not as an argument. The window is an aperture to the future ("a long procession of years… that would belong to her absolutely"), opposed to the locked room behind her and the staircase that leads back down to social roles and, finally, to the front door where the old life re-enters. When she leaves the window, she leaves the only space where her selfhood existed.
Is Louise presented as an unloving wife? Answer with support from the text (min. 3 sentences).
No — the narration concedes that she had loved Brently "sometimes," that his hands were kind and tender, and that she will weep again when she sees his dead face. Her joy is not directed against him but toward "self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being"; even love, the text says, counts for little beside possession of oneself. Chopin also universalizes the insight: Louise reflects that kind intentions make the "bending" of one will by another no less a crime. The story therefore indicts the institution that makes freedom and marriage incompatible, not the individuals inside it.
Related topics and texts
Ambrose Bierce — "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" (1890) — war short story
¶- What it is: Published in the San Francisco Examiner on 13 July 1890 and collected in Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (1891; later reissued as In the Midst of Life). Part I: on a railroad bridge in northern Alabama, Union soldiers prepare with ritual precision to hang a civilian; time dilates around him — the ticking of his watch tolls like an anvil — and he thinks of escape. Part II: a flashback identifies him as Peyton Farquhar, a wealthy Alabama planter and ardent secessionist kept from the army, who was lured into attempting to burn the bridge by a gray-clad soldier who asked for water at his gate — "He was a Federal scout." Part III: the rope breaks; Farquhar falls into the stream, frees his hands with superhuman clarity, dodges volleys and cannon, swims to shore, and walks all night through an ever-stranger forest until he reaches his plantation, where his wife steps down to meet him — then a blinding blow, and darkness. The last sentence withdraws the whole escape: "Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body, with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge."
- Themes & motifs: The dying man's fantasy — desire outrunning reality in the second before death; war stripped of chivalry: an execution, not a battle, and a would-be hero who is really a dupe; subjective versus mechanical time (the watch); deception on every level — the disguised scout deceives Farquhar, Farquhar's brain deceives him, the narrative deceives the reader; the romantic civilian imagination of war punished by war's procedures.
- Form & devices: Tripartite structure — objective execution scene / explanatory flashback / subjective escape — with the analepsis suspending the drop across the whole story; manipulation of duration: seconds stretched into pages as dying perception dilates; deep focalization whose sensory exaggerations (seeing the individual veining of leaves, the gray eye of the marksman through the rifle sights, hearing insects) signal unreality even as they persuade; the deadpan final sentence as structural twist; a clinical narrator whose military exactness ironizes the event (the title's neutral "occurrence"). The device of the extended death-instant made the story a model for later fiction and film — famously adapted as a French short film (1962) aired on The Twilight Zone.
- Context & significance: Bierce fought through the Civil War in the 9th Indiana Infantry (Shiloh, Chickamauga; severely wounded at Kennesaw Mountain, 1864) — almost alone among major American authors in writing the war from combat experience. "Bitter Bierce," journalist and author of The Devil's Dictionary (1906/1911), disappeared into revolutionary Mexico in 1913–14 — a famous unsolved vanishing. His war fiction's cold irony bridges realism and naturalism and anticipates the anti-romantic war writing of Crane and Hemingway.
-
Remember:
- San Francisco Examiner, 13 July 1890; collected in Tales of Soldiers and Civilians (1891) (= In the Midst of Life).
- Three numbered parts; Part II ends "He was a Federal scout."
- Peyton Farquhar: Alabama planter and civilian secessionist, hanged for attempting to sabotage the repaired bridge.
- Bierce: Union veteran (Shiloh, Chickamauga, wounded 1864); vanished in Mexico, 1913/14; The Devil's Dictionary.
-
Quotable: "He was a Federal scout." — "Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body, with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge."
Exam angles
Describe the effect of the story's three-part structure and its handling of time (min. 3 sentences).
Part I presents the execution with objective, almost ceremonial precision and then slips inside the condemned man just as his senses begin to distort — the ticking watch swelling into anvil strokes announces that subjective time has replaced clock time. Part II suspends the drop entirely for a flashback that explains who Farquhar is and how a disguised Federal scout entrapped him, ending on the story's first sting: "He was a Federal scout." Part III then expands the instant between the drop and death into a whole night of imagined escape, so the reader lives inside a duration that objectively does not exist. The final sentence collapses the structure retroactively, forcing a rereading in which every marvel of Part III becomes a symptom of dying consciousness.
By what means does Bierce signal that the escape is a fantasy before the final sentence?
The escape is narrated with sensory impossibilities: the hanged man sees the veining of individual leaves and the insects upon them, hears fish gliding through the water, and distinguishes the gray eye of a marksman through a rifle's sights across the river. Physical details keep intruding from the actual death — the agony in his neck, the swollen tongue, the congested eyes that can no longer close. The homeward road is dream geography: untraveled, without habitation, lit by strange constellations, ending in a doorstep vision of the wife suspended in perpetual welcome. The prose itself grows lyrical and unreal, so the "blinding white light" of the last paragraph merely confirms what the style has been confessing.
What is the function of the Federal scout episode in Part II? (min. 3 sentences)
The flashback shows that Farquhar's mission was manufactured: a Federal scout in Confederate gray plants the idea of burning the bridge and the information about its vulnerability at Farquhar's own gate. The episode punctures the planter's romantic self-image — the civilian who "longed for the larger life of the soldier" achieves only a policed execution arranged by his enemies. It generalizes the story's theme of deception: Farquhar is deceived by the scout as the reader is deceived by Part III, and both deceptions exploit a hunger for heroic narrative. War appears not as chivalric opportunity but as an impersonal system of intelligence, procedure, and rope.
Related topics and texts
Primer. Naturalism (c. 1890s–1920s), theorized by Émile Zola as the "experimental novel," treats human beings as organisms determined by heredity, environment, instinct, and chance rather than free moral agents — Darwin and Spencer applied to fiction. Its plots slide toward decline, violence, or destruction; its manner combines documentary detail with indifference to consolation (the department's sample question defines biological determinism as behavior "driven by instinct rather than free will" — that is the formula to remember). American naturalists: Stephen Crane (also an impressionist), Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser. Crane's Maggie: A Girl of the Streets (1893) is the pioneering American naturalist novella; Dreiser's Sister Carrie (1900) and An American Tragedy (1925) are the movement's monuments, and his late story "Typhoon" (1926) shows the doctrine intact into the jazz age.
Stephen Crane — The Red Badge of Courage (1895) — war novel
¶Reading focus: the assigned short extract shows Henry's self-congratulation after one attack, the renewed attack and his flight. Practise its animal and machine imagery closely. The ironic head wound and Jim Conklin's death belong to the wider novel and help explain its title and context.
- What it is: Novel subtitled An Episode of the American Civil War, syndicated in a drastically abridged newspaper version in December 1894 and published in book form by D. Appleton in 1895. Henry Fleming, "the youth," enlists in the (fictional) 304th New York with Homeric visions of glory against his mother's plain advice. In his first engagement he holds; when the enemy unexpectedly returns, he panics and runs, then wanders the rear rationalizing his flight (the squirrel he startles seems to prove flight is nature's law), watches his friend Jim Conklin, "the tall soldier," die grotesquely after Chancellorsville-like fighting — "The red sun was pasted in the sky like a wafer" — and abandons the persistent "tattered soldier" whose questions shame him. Wishing he too had "a red badge of courage," he receives his wound ironically: a fleeing Union soldier clubs him with a rifle. Taken for a grazed combatant, he returns to his regiment, fights next day in a fury, carries the flag, and the novel closes on his quiet self-congratulation — "He was a man."
- Themes & motifs: Courage and cowardice demythologized — heroism as accident, instinct, vanity, and luck; the indifference of nature (the tranquil forest "chapel" with its ant-covered corpse; the serene sky over slaughter); the individual dissolved in the crowd and the machine of the regiment; the gap between war as imagined (Greek-like struggles) and war as process; maturation left deliberately ambiguous.
- Form & devices: Third-person narration locked to Henry's perceptions and saturated with irony at his expense; literary impressionism — battle rendered as color, noise, and fragment ("the red sickness of battle"; the wafer sun) rather than strategy; naturalist imagery of men as animals and machines; characters identified by epithet ("the youth," "the loud soldier," "the tall soldier"), universalizing the episode; the battle never named in the text (scholarship, classically Harold Hungerford's 1963 article, identifies it from internal evidence as Chancellorsville, May 1863); religious-sounding images (the wafer) that critics still dispute.
- Context & significance: Crane, born 1871, wrote the most convincing American combat novel without having seen war, working from veterans' accounts and the Century magazine's "Battles and Leaders" series; veterans nonetheless vouched for its accuracy, and his later war reporting (Greece, Cuba) confirmed for him that he had guessed right. The novel made "war without romance" canonical and leads directly to Hemingway. Crane's Maggie (1893) had already introduced naturalist determinism; "The Open Boat" (1897) perfects the indifferent universe; he died of tuberculosis in 1900, aged 28.
-
Remember:
- Book 1895 (D. Appleton); abridged newspaper syndication December 1894; subtitle An Episode of the American Civil War.
- Battle never named; identified by scholars as Chancellorsville (May 1863); regiment: the fictional 304th New York.
- The "red badge" is ironic: Henry's head wound comes from a fleeing Union soldier's rifle butt.
- Jim Conklin = "the tall soldier" (his death precedes the wafer sentence); Wilson = "the loud soldier."
- Crane: b. 1871 (after the war), Maggie 1893, "The Open Boat" 1897, died 1900 at 28.
-
Passage practice: Follow the shift from Henry's pleased self-image to the second attack. His body is compared to an exhausted horse, the enemy to steel machines and dragons, another fleeing soldier to a rabbit, and Henry himself to a chicken. These comparisons make fear physical and contagious: he follows others and mistakes a few fugitives for the whole regiment. Explain the conflict between his ideal of heroic self-command and his urgent wish to survive; do not call the animal imagery a literal biological diagnosis.
- Quotable: "The red sun was pasted in the sky like a wafer." — "He wished that he, too, had a wound, a red badge of courage." — "He was a man."
Exam angles
Explain the irony of the novel's title (min. 3 sentences).
In the army's semiotics a wound is a "red badge of courage" — visible certification of bravery — and Henry, wandering unwounded among the injured after his flight, explicitly envies and wishes for one. The wound he then receives is a fraud twice over: it is inflicted not by the enemy but by a panicking Union soldier's rifle butt, and it is earned in flight, not combat. Because his comrades read the gash as proof of battle, the false badge purchases his reintegration and even his later reputation. The title therefore names the novel's central irony: the signs by which courage is publicly recognized are accidental and readable only wrongly.
In what ways is the novel a departure from romantic war narrative? (min. 3 sentences)
Crane empties war of chivalry by restricting the narrative to a frightened boy's perceptions: battle arrives as smoke, noise, rumor, and crowd-panic, never as strategy or cause — the enemy is barely seen and the battle never named. Naturalist and mechanical imagery dominates, with the regiment moving like a machine or an animal and Henry's own crucial acts (running away, fighting furiously) presented as unreasoning reflex rather than choice. Nature refuses to cooperate with heroic feeling — the forest stays serene around a rotting corpse, and the sun hangs pasted in the sky "like a wafer" over Jim Conklin's hideous death. Even the maturation plot is ironized, since Henry's final "quiet manhood" rests partly on a lie he never confesses.
Characterize Crane's impressionism with examples (min. 3 sentences).
Crane renders battle as subjective sensation rather than objective event: colors carry the meaning ("the red sickness of battle," the "red badge" itself, the wafer-red sun), and sounds arrive as weirdly displaced phenomena before they are understood. Perception is fragmentary and metaphor-driven — regiments crawl like serpents in the dark, and Henry's terrors magnify or shrink the world from moment to moment. This technique makes the reader share the youth's epistemic blindness: we know only what floods his senses, which is exactly the novel's argument about war. The style thus fuses impressionist surface with naturalist doctrine, since minds so at the mercy of stimuli can hardly be free agents.
Related topics and texts
Theodore Dreiser — "Typhoon" (1926) — naturalist short story
¶- What it is: A long short story first published in magazine form in 1926 and collected in Chains: Lesser Novels and Stories (Boni & Liveright, 1927). Ida Zobel grows up motherless in a "singularly restricted" German-immigrant household: her father William Zobel, a rigid paint-store owner contemptuous of jazz-age America ("brash gayety and looseness"), rations her life between home, his store, and a private German school, while her stepmother polices her friendships. At sixteen the swaggering Edward Hauptwanger appears; secret walks and boat evenings in King Lake Park end in seduction and pregnancy. When Edward refuses marriage and prepares to run, Ida takes her father's eight-shot revolver from the store desk — intending only to threaten him — and in the confrontation ("You will marry me, Ed, you will! You will! You see this? You will marry me!") shoots him dead in the street, confessing on the spot: "Yes, I shot him… He wouldn't marry me. He should have but he wouldn't — and so —". A press sensation makes her a popular heroine; sheltered by a wealthy patroness, she bears a son, Eric, and is promptly acquitted "with loud public acclaim," the public being "all for romance and drastic drama." But back in the gray parental world she cannot re-enter life; one evening she returns to the couple's old nook at King Lake Park and wades deliberately into the water — "Ida Zobel — Girl Slayer of Hauptwanger a Suicide," and then, as the story ends, "forgotten."
- Themes & motifs: Naturalist determinism: temperament, repressive upbringing, sexual desire and circumstance constrain the choices available to the characters; sexual desire as an impersonal force (the "typhoon" of the title) tearing through an over-ordered world; the double standard and the ruined-girl plot inverted — here the girl shoots the seducer; Old-World immigrant rigidity versus 1920s American youth culture (movies, cars, flappers, "petting parties"); the press and public as a sentimental chorus that consumes and forgets; water as the medium of romance and of death.
- Form & devices: Omniscient naturalist narration with documentary sociological texture (the household's rules quoted like exhibits); Dreiser's late impressionistic, telegraphic style — fragments and exclamations mimicking the buffeting of forces ("And these young scamps… The loose, indifferent parents. The loose, free ways…"); the recurring authorial refrain "The world does not understand such things," framing events as process, not sin; symbolic set pieces: the Lorelei fountain statue of a German maiden and kneeling lover (the myth of fatal desire literally installed in the patroness's garden), King Lake and the boats, the closing newspaper headline as the world's last shallow word.
- Context & significance: A late document of American Naturalism — written immediately after An American Tragedy (1925), whose seduction-pregnancy-death material it reworks with the genders reversed (Clyde Griffiths drowns pregnant Roberta; Ida shoots Edward and then drowns herself). Dreiser's determinism — instinct and circumstance overriding will, desire as body chemistry (his recurring notion of "chemisms") — is exactly the "biological determinism" the exam's sample question defines as instinct-driven behavior rather than free will. Dreiser: Sister Carrie (1900), An American Tragedy (1925); died 1945.
-
Remember:
- Magazine publication 1926; collected in Chains: Lesser Novels and Stories (1927, Boni & Liveright).
- Names: Ida Zobel; father William Zobel (paint store); seducer Edward Hauptwanger; the child Eric; setting anchored by King Lake Park.
- Sequence: seduction → pregnancy → refused marriage → shooting with her father's revolver → sensational trial → acquittal → suicide by drowning.
- Movement tag: late Naturalism; gender-inverted companion to An American Tragedy (1925).
-
Quotable: "The world does not understand such things." — the final headline: "Ida Zobel — Girl Slayer of Hauptwanger a Suicide."
Exam angles
Using complete sentences (min. 3), show how "Typhoon" exemplifies naturalist determinism.
Ida is constructed by forces she never chose: a joyless hereditary temperament, a father's regime that forbids every outlet, and then the first plausible object of awakened instinct, Edward, whose own vanity and appetite are equally unexamined. The catastrophe proceeds by mechanism rather than decision — she takes the revolver only to threaten, and panic, not intention, fires it, just as fear of exposure, not villainous plotting, drives Edward's refusal. Society then behaves as deterministically as the lovers: the press manufactures a heroine, the jury acquits on sentiment, and the public forgets. Dreiser's refrain, "The world does not understand such things," asks readers to examine these interacting pressures rather than settle for the newspaper's melodrama. Biological determinism concerns the force of instinct; the controlling household, publicity and verdict also invite social explanations. Distinguish those mechanisms instead of making every event evidence for biology alone.
What does the title "Typhoon" refer to?
The title’s storm is figurative; the typhoon is Dreiser's metaphor for the elemental force of sexual desire that bursts into the Zobels' rigidly ordered German household and wrecks every life it touches. It also names the storm of scandal and publicity — headlines, crowds, courtroom sentiment — that follows the shooting and buffets Ida a second time. Both storms share the point of the metaphor: they are impersonal weather, beyond anyone's control or understanding, and they pass, leaving the final headline and then oblivion. The title thus compresses the story's naturalism into a single meteorological image.
Compare "Typhoon" with "An American Tragedy" (min. 3 sentences).
Both works, written back to back in the mid-1920s, build on the same naturalist matrix: a repressive upbringing, class- and pleasure-hungry youth, seduction, pregnancy, a refused marriage, and a death by violence followed by a sensational trial. Dreiser inverts the genders — in the novel Clyde Griffiths lets his pregnant lover Roberta drown; in the story the pregnant Ida shoots her evasive seducer and later drowns herself — so that the story reads like the novel's mirror image. In both, the press and courtroom turn private catastrophe into public melodrama, and the verdict (Clyde's conviction, Ida's acquittal) answers public sentiment more than fact. The pairing shows Dreiser's conviction that such tragedies are generated by American conditions and instincts, whichever sex pulls the trigger.
Timeline of the sixteen texts
¶| Year | Text | Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1776 | Paine, Common Sense | Enlightenment / Revolution |
| 1784 | Franklin, "Remarks Concerning the Savages" | Enlightenment satire |
| 1790 | Franklin, "On the Slave Trade" | Enlightenment satire (his last) |
| 1820 | Irving, "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" | early Romanticism |
| 1843 | Poe, "The Black Cat" | dark Romanticism |
| 1843 | Hawthorne, "The Birth-Mark" | dark Romanticism |
| 1845 | Douglass, Narrative | slave narrative |
| 1853 | Melville, "Bartleby, the Scrivener" | dark Romanticism / proto-modern |
| 1865 | Whitman, "When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer" (Drum-Taps) | Romantic poetry / free verse |
| c. 1865 (pub. 1890) | Dickinson, "I never saw a Moor" | Romantic poetry / private lyric |
| 1890 | Bierce, "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" | realism's dark edge |
| 1893 | Chopin, "Désirée's Baby" | local color / realism |
| 1894 | Chopin, "A Respectable Woman" | local color / realism |
| 1894 | Chopin, "The Story of an Hour" | realism / proto-feminism |
| 1895 | Crane, The Red Badge of Courage | naturalism + impressionism |
| 1926 | Dreiser, "Typhoon" | late naturalism |
Twist and final-line endings (exam favorites)
| Text | The ending to know |
|---|---|
| Owl Creek Bridge | Whole escape = dying fantasy; final sentence reveals Farquhar hanging dead beneath the bridge |
| The Story of an Hour | Husband alive at the door; Louise dies; doctors: "of the joy that kills"; the reader’s access to Louise’s earlier sense of freedom makes their explanation deeply ironic, without supplying a medical diagnosis |
| Désirée's Baby | After Désirée vanishes in the bayou, the mother's letter reveals the African ancestry is Armand's |
| The Black Cat | Narrator's rap on the wall; the cat, walled in with the wife's corpse, betrays him |
| Bartleby | Dies in the Tombs refusing food; rumor of the Dead Letter Office; "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!" |
| The Birth-Mark | The mark fades and Georgiana dies at the moment of success; Aminadab laughs |
| Sleepy Hollow | Hat + shattered pumpkin; Brom's knowing look vs. the old wives' ghost version |
| Typhoon | Acquitted Ida drowns herself at King Lake Park; headline, then "forgotten" |
| A Respectable Woman | "I have overcome everything… This time I shall be very nice to him." — deliberately double-edged |
Narration and technique at a glance
| Text | Technique |
|---|---|
| Sleepy Hollow | Double frame: Crayon publishes Knickerbocker's papers + skeptical postscript |
| The Black Cat | Unreliable first-person confession on the eve of execution |
| Bartleby | First-person lawyer-narrator; the teller becomes the subject |
| Owl Creek | Three parts; flashback; dilated subjective time; twist final sentence |
| Douglass | First-person retrospective autobiography with authenticating white prefaces |
| Red Badge | Third-person limited to Henry + pervasive irony; impressionist color |
| Chopin (all three) | Third-person limited with free indirect discourse; economy + irony |
| Whitman | Free verse, anaphora, single periodic sentence |
| Dickinson | Hymn-derived short-metre pattern, dashes, conditional comparison ("As if") |
| Franklin ×2 | Persona/hoax satire; anecdote with structural irony |
| Paine | Plain-style pamphlet rhetoric; biblical argument; aphorism |
| Dreiser | Omniscient naturalist narration; refrain; documentary detail |
Common traps
- "These are the times that try men's souls" = The American Crisis (Dec. 1776), not Common Sense (Jan. 1776).
- Whitman's astronomer poem is from Drum-Taps (1865) — not the 1855 first edition of Leaves of Grass; spelling "Learn'd."
- Dickinson published about ten poems in her lifetime (not zero, not "a few dozen"); total ≈ 1,800 (1,789 in Franklin's edition).
- Red Badge: the battle is never named in the novel — Chancellorsville is a scholarly identification; Crane was born 1871 and never saw the war; Bierce, by contrast, fought in it.
- Chopin titles: exam list's "The Father of Désirée's Baby" = "Désirée's Baby" (original Vogue title); "The Story of an Hour" first appeared as "The Dream of an Hour."
- Franklin's "On the Slave Trade" is a hoax: no real Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim, no real "Martin's Account" — that is the joke, not an error.
- "Bartleby" and the Putnam's publication were anonymous; the full title includes "A Story of Wall-Street."
- Hawthorne's "The Birth-Mark" (also printed "The Birthmark") is collected in Mosses from an Old Manse — not Twice-Told Tales.